Postnatal age influences the ability of rats to autoresuscitate from hypoxic-induced apnea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Failure to autoresuscitate from apnea by gasping has been suggested to have a role in sudden infant death. Little is known, however, about the factors that influence the ability of gasping to sustain life during acute hypoxia in the newborn. The present experiments were carried out on 105 rat pups to investigate the influence of postnatal age on the time to last gasp during a single hypoxic exposure and on the ability to autoresuscitate from primary apnea during repeated hypoxic exposures. On days 1-2, 5-6, 10-11, 15-16, and 19-20 postpartum, each pup was placed into a temperature-controlled chamber regulated to 37 +/- 1 degrees C and was exposed either to a single period of hypoxia produced by breathing an anoxic gas mixture (97% N(2)-3% CO(2)), and the time to last gasp was determined, or repeated exposure to hypoxia was performed, and the ability to autoresuscitate from primary apnea was determined. Increases in postnatal age decreased the time to last gasp following a single hypoxic exposure and decreased the number of successful autoresuscitations following repeated hypoxic exposures. Thus our data provide evidence that postnatal age influences protective responses that may prevent death during hypoxia as may occur during episodes of prolonged sleep apnea.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".