Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 3: is there still a value in a nuchal translucency screening ultrasound in conjunction with maternal plasma non‐invasive cell‐free DNA testing?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
What's already known about this topic? Nuchal translucency is an ultrasound measurement of the fetal physiological lymphatic development as it can identify both normal and abnormal lymphatic collections. Abnormal or enlarged nuchal translucency measurements are nonspecific and heterogeneous in origin. The source of maternal plasma cell free fetal DNA is placental apoptosis. The embryonic and cellular development of the placenta can have true chromosomal mosaicism (involves fetus and placenta) orconfined placental mosaicism (CPM) (placenta only). CPM is present in 1–2% of placentas and can cause false positive results for diagnostic chorionic villus sampling and maternalplasma cell free DNA prenatal aneuploidy screening resultswhile false negative placental results are much less common at 1 per 3000. What does this study add? This report summarizes an oral debate presented at the 19th International Conference on Prenatal Diagnosis and Therapy inWashington, DC, USA, on 14 July 2015. This study compares the fetal aneuploidy screening and detection process with the ultrasound nuchal translucency aneuploidy-geneticpathology screening test/measurement and the more recent maternal plasma cell free DNA aneuploidy only screening test when used in conjunction or separately. Informed consent and patient understanding of the aneuploidy screening options and techniques is an important counselling principle for the variety of aneuploidy and genetic screening protocols.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".