MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2222796756 · doi:10.4271/2000-01-2360

Results of Human-in-the-Loop Testing of the Force/Moment Accommodation Feature using the Special Purpose Dexterous Manipulator Ground Test Bed

2000· article· en· W2222796756 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Raja Mukherji, John Lymer

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAccommodationMoment (physics)Human-in-the-loopManipulator (device)Computer scienceLoop (graph theory)Test (biology)Structural engineeringSimulationEngineeringArtificial intelligenceGeologyRobotPhysicsMathematicsOpticsClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Special Purpose Dexterous Manipulator (SPDM) is part of Canada's contribution to the International Space Station. Crew members inside the pressurized volume will command this dexterous robot to perform maintenance operations on the station that are normally associated with Extra-Vehicular Activities (EVA's). Operations will include complex tasks such as the replacement of faulty electronics units and battery boxes, collectively called Orbital Replaceable Units (ORUs). This type of task requires a manipulator that precisely controls and regulates contact forces. Precision is necessary to sense and correct for positional misalignments during the insertion of ORUs as well as to prevent jamming and overloading the ORU and worksite. The SPDM employs a feature called Force/Moment Accommodation (FMA), which is the robotic analogue of the crew member's sense of touch and muscle response, to actively regulate or accommodate the forces and moments generated during contact operations in all six degrees of freedom. This feature allows the robot to handle the fine alignment function during an ORU insertion task without operator input. The FMA feature has been demonstrated on the SPDM Ground Test Bed (SPDM GT), a gravity compensated robotic arm that is functionally and dynamically equivalent to the flight SPDM arm. An international crew evaluation of the berthing task using two types of flight ORUs and the SPDM GT was conducted. Trials with and without FMA active show that FMA significantly reduces operator workload and timeline. In addition, FMA enables the operator to perform robotic tasks that are not possible without this type of automatic control feature. The crew rated the ORU insertion task a 1 on the Cooper-Harper scale (excellent) when FMA was active, and rated the task between 6 and 9 (poor) when FMA was disabled. The trials have confirmed that the SPDM with FMA enabled is a capable, flexible tool suited for a variety of tasks normally performed by EVA's.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesSame topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207