MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Tumor regression and pharmacodynamic (PD) biomarker validation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with the ErbB/VEGFR inhibitor BMS-690514

2009· article· en· W2222964070 on OpenAlexaff
Ratislav Bahleda, Jean‐Charles Soria, C. Harbison, J. Park, Enriqueta Felip, Nadine Hanna, Scott A. Laurie, P. Armand, Frances A. Shepherd, Roy S. Herbst

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Canadian institutionsBristol-Myers Squibb (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsErlotinibMedicineRashInternal medicineKRASLung cancerOncologyT790MEGFR inhibitorsEpidermal growth factor receptorCancerGastroenterologyColorectal cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

8098 Background: BMS-690514 is an oral selective inhibitor of EGFR, HER2, and VEGFR1–3. Previous results from the phase I portion of this phase I/II study established 200 mg/day as safe and tolerable (ASCO 2008; abstr 2564). Methods: Erlotinib-naïve and erlotinib-resistant adult patients with advanced/metastatic, measurable NSCLC received BMS-690514 200 mg/d. Eligible patients had an ECOG PS ≤1 and adequate organ function. Objectives were to assess disease control rate (DCR; CR, PR, SD ≥4 months), safety, PK and potential predictive and PD biomarkers of BMS-690514. Response was assessed every 8 weeks (modified WHO criteria). Predictive biomarkers included EGFR copy number, and EGFR and KRAS mutations. PD biomarkers included immunohistochemistry of EGFR signaling proteins in skin biopsies, circulating sVEGFR2, blood pressure, skin rash and diarrhea. Results: For 60 patients treated, DCR were 11/28 (39%) and 7/32 (22%) for erlotinib-naive and -resistant patients, respectively. DCR was significantly higher among patients harboring an EGFR mutation (6/8) than those with WT EGFR (5/18). One erlotinib-naive patient had PR (57 wks) and subsequent surgical removal of remaining tumor. Regression (48%) was seen in one erlotinib-naive patient harboring a KRAS G13D mutation. One erlotinib-resistant patient had PR (66%, 31 wks). Two erlotinib-resistant patients with EGFR T790M mutations had SD with 6% and 31% decrease in tumor burden. Most frequent treatment-related AES were diarrhea (90%), skin rash (31%), asthenia (29%), anorexia (27%), hypertension (26%), and reversible acute renal insufficiency (11%). sVEGFR2 (14% decrease from baseline, n=14) and decreased pMAPK levels from skin biopsies (14 of 18 pts) were consistent with EGFR and VEGFR2 inhibition. Conclusions: BMS-690514 200 mg/d showed evidence of anti-tumor activity and disease control in patients with NSCLC, including erlotinib-resistant and those with WT EGFR, EGFR T790M or KRAS mutations. Predictive and PD clinical biomarkers confirmed inhibition of both EGFR and VEGFR signaling pathways by BMS-690514. A randomized phase II trial versus erlotinib in NSCLC is underway. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.444
Teacher spread0.410 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsFrench-language works237,207