The Stressors in Professional Women's Work-Family Conflict: A Chinese Study/L'ORIGINE DE STRESS DANS LE CONFLIT TRAVAIL-FAMILLE CHEZ LES FEMMES PROFESSIONNELLES: UNE ÉTUDE CHINOISE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: On the base of some existing studies on the we investigated 121 professional women on role conflict. It summarizes the actuality of the professional women's work-family conflict, discusses the relation of the women's work-family conflict and their stressors, analyses the self-factors that effect the professional women's work-family conflict. The result showed that (1) professional women's self-role perceived and social-role perceived have conflicts;(2) education, incoming ratio, professional experience can influence the stress;(3) domesticity satisfaction, family activity, spouse stress, work devotion and work load are stressors of professional women' s work-family conflict. Key words: professional woman; work family conflict; stressor Resume: Sur la base des etudes existantes sur le travail-famille, nous avons enquete sur 121 femmes professionnelles sur le role des conflits. Il resume la realite du conflit travail-famille des femmes professionnelles, traite de la relation entre le conflit travail-famille et leur origine de stress et analyse des facteurs qui ont des influences sur le conflit travail-famille des femmes professionnelles. Le resultat a montre que (1)il y a des conflits entre le role personnel et le role social chez les femmes professionnelles; (2) l'education, les revenus, l'experience professionnelle peuvent influencer le stress; (3) la satisfaction de la domesticite, les activites familiales, le stress conjugal, le devouement pour le travail et les charges professionnelles sont des origines de stress des femmes professionnelles dans le conflit travail-famille. Mots-Cles: femmes professionnelles; le conflit travail-famille; l'origine de stress 1. BACKGROUND Nowadays, it's important for women to participate in the social development with abroad occupational modes, and it's meaningful for women's development. However, we still have two expectations for women. One side we hope women can attach themselves to social job and pay out for the society. The other side we still hope they can play their family roles well. Because of the limited time and energy, it's very difficult for women to act each roles well, and it will bring work-family conflict easily(TONG ShaoSu, 1995). Several researches have indicated that work-family conflict can make negative influence for individual mentality and physiology, including individual body health was damaged, emotion descend and can't play family role employable, then reduce the family, marriage quality and well-being[2]; in work field, it behave as late, absent, turnover , and reduce the productivity, work satisfaction and organizational commitment(Greenhaus J H, et al., 1985;Higgins C A, et al., 1992; O'Driscoll M P, et al., 1996). Thus it can be seen that it's very important for both company and women to study the work-family conflict. Robbins(1993) defined the work-family conflict as: when the people faced to the branching role expectation, work-family conflict appears. Here, you will find if you obey one of the roles' request, you can't obey another role request. When people can't meet several roles' requests at one time, the role conflict comes into being(Robbins S P., 1992). Higgins(1992) bring forward work-family conflict model. He considered that stress is the causation to make one's mentality unbalanced, and named the factors to bring stress as stressor. Based on the former studies, our research try to realize the relationship between work- family conflict and role stressor more, then find the professional women's work- family conflict development rules, help the women adjust the attitudes to their work and living status, and provide research evidence to improve the professional women's mental healthy. 2. METHOD 2.1 Participants Participants were from 22 organizations in the HangZhou City, including financial, manufacturing, education, medical and civil servant. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".