MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An uncharacteristic new population of the Mountain Pygmy-possum <i>Burramys</i> parvus in New South Wales

2012· article· en· W2224878697 on OpenAlexaff
Martin Schulz, Gabriel Wilks, Linda Broome

Bibliographic record

VenueAustralian Zoologist · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsDepartment of Environment and Conservation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCaveNational parkMontane ecologyGeographyArchaeologyPopulationNorthern territoryEcologyBiologyDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Mountain Pygmy-possum Burramys parvus was first described from a fossil found in Wombeyan Caves, central-eastern New South Wales in 1895, with further fossils located in Buchan Caves in eastern Victoria and Jenolan Caves in central-eastern New South Wales (Broom 1896; Wakefield 1960; Hope 1982). In August 1966 a living individual was located in the University Ski Lodge on Mt Higginbotham in the Victorian Alps (Ride 1970; Dixon 1971). The first discovery of the species in New South Wales was an individual trapped in Kosciuszko National Park in early 1970 (Calaby et al. 1971). Over the next three decades Burramys parvus was located in three regional populations that were separated by low elevation river valleys in the subalpine and alpine areas of south-eastern Australia. These regional populations are located in Kosciuszko National Park in New South Wales, the Bogong High Plains area (including sub-populations on Mt Bogong, the Bogong High Plains and Mt Higginbotham) and at Mt Buller in Victoria. Highest densities and breeding females are largely confined to periglacial blockfields and blockstreams (termed boulderfields) at altitudes above 1400 m in Victoria and 1600 m in New South Wales (Caughley 1986; Mansergh and Broome 1994; Heinze and Williams 1998; Osborne et al. 2000; Heinze et al. 2004; Broome et al. 2005). The lower altitudinal limit roughly corresponds with the winter snowline of around 1370 m in altitude (Davis 1998). The New South Wales population was recently estimated at 613 + 92 individuals (Broome et al. 2005) and is restricted to small patches of preferred boulderfield habitat between South Ramshead in the Thredbo area north to Gungartan Pass in southern Kosciuszko National Park in an area measuring 30 km by 8 km (Caughley 1986; NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service 2002; Broome et al. 2005). As a result of the small population size, extremely restricted distribution and threats associated with ski-run development Burramys parvus has been listed as Endangered under both the Federal Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 and the New South Wales Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.130

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAustralian ZoologistSame topicWildlife Ecology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207