World pork production and its trends
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper gives the survey of world pork production, by continents and some countries. It has been found that world pork production is constantly increasing. In 2001 it amounted to 91.188.000 tons, in 2002 it was 94.186.000 tons, in 2003 it was 98.473.000 tons, in 2004 it was 100.483.000 tons and in 2005 it was 102.523.000 tons. In the period from 2001 to 2005, the world pork production trend was positive and amounted to 2.896.700 tons a year. Observed by continents, the largest pork production in 2005 was recorded in: Asia (58.439.000 tons), followed by Europe (25.627.000 tons), then North and Middle America (12.751.000 tons), South America (4.372.000 tons), Africa (809.000 tons) and countries of Oceania (526.000 tons). Pork production trend in the period from 2001 to 2005 was positive in all the continents. The largest production was in Asia (Y = 46.114.000 + 2.595.000 x - expressed in tons), followed by Europe (Y = 23.254.900 + 967.300 x), then South America (Y = 2.828.200 + 354.800 x), North and Central America (Y = 11.761.300 + 205.900 x), Africa (Y = 605.900 + 47.900 x) and Oceania (Y = 499.200 + 8.800 x). The leading pork producers in 2005 were: China (50.095.000 tons), USA (9.402.000 tons), Germany (4.505.000 tons), Spain (3.310.000 tons), Brazil (3.110.000 tons), France (2.257.000 tons), Canada (1.960.000 tons), Poland (1.923.000 tons), Denmark (1.800.000 tons), Russian Federation (1.610.000 tons), Italy (1.550.000 tons), The Netherlands (1.299.000 tons), Japan (1.250.000 tons) and Belgium - Luxemburg (1.100.000 tons). Positive trends in pork production in the period from 2001 to 2005, were shown in the following countries Austria, Belgium - Luxemburg, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Denmark, Italy, Serbia and Montenegro, Macedonia, Germany, Poland, Russian Federation, Slovenia Spain, Japan, China, Nigeria, Canada, USA, Brazil, Chile, Australia and New Zealand. Negative trends in pork production, in the period from 2001 to 2005 were shown in the following countries: UK, France, The Netherlands, Czech Republic, Hungary and Romania.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".