MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2225432798 · doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-224-7_5

Infant Nutrition in the Middle East

2012· book-chapter· en· W2225432798 on OpenAlexaff
Malek Batal, Laura Hjeij Awada

Bibliographic record

VenueHumana Press eBooks · 2012
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicChild Nutrition and Water Access
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMiddle EastLife expectancyMalnutritionUnderweightGeographyOverweightEnvironmental healthEconomic growthSocioeconomicsDevelopment economicsObesityMedicinePopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region covers countries of Western Asia and North Africa. An ethnically and socioeconomically diversified region, MENA encompasses more than 360 million Arab, Persian, Jewish, and Kurdish inhabitants dispersed across nations that range from the oil-rich to the resource-scarce [1, 2]. Opinions vary as to what and how many countries make up this region [2–4]. For the purpose of the current chapter, a commonly recognized map of the region (refer to Fig. 5.1) is adopted. The region has witnessed great progress on multiple socio-health indicators over the last decade; this is shown by an average life expectancy of 71 years, an under-5 mortality rate of 38/1,000, and a decline in the prevalence of underweight and stunting in children under 5–12 % and 25 %, respectively [2, 5]. Despite this encouraging trend, malnutrition, whether in deficiency (undernutrition) or excess (overweight/obesity), remains a chief contributor to the national and global burden of disease. Both these conditions can coexist in the same county forcing it to deal with the high cost of treating diet-related diseases while trying to set up a national plan to combat nutritional deficiencies [3, 6].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.145 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHumana Press eBooksSame topicChild Nutrition and Water AccessFrench-language works237,207