MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Telomere maintenance predicts progression and survival in pediatric intracranial ependymoma

2006· article· en· W2225516900 on OpenAlexaffabout
Uri Tabori, Éric Bouffet, Ute Bartels, David Malkin, Cynthia Hawkins

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTelomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelomereTelomeraseTelomerase reverse transcriptaseMedicineEpendymomaOncologyMultivariate analysisPathologicalInternal medicineCancer researchPathologyBiologyGeneticsDNAGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

10020 Background: Ependymoma is the third most common pediatric brain tumor. Despite the importance of surgical resection and pathology, its clinical course is highly unpredictable and the biological behavior is largely unknown. As part of ongoing studies to identify potential biological and therapeutic markers for the disease, we analyzed the role of telomere maintenance, which is required for cancers to sustain growth and evade senescence. Methods: We analyzed 111 primary and recurrent ependymomas that were resected at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto between 1986 and 2004. A tissue array was constructed. hTERT and γH2AX expression were evaluated. Thirty-one frozen samples were additionally analyzed for telomere length (TRF) and telomerase activity (TRAP assay). Results: Of the 111 samples, 40 tumors were hTERT(-) with progression-free survival (PFS) of 83±15% and 71 were hTERT(+) with PFS of 21±9% (p<0.0001). Of the 65 patients with primary ependymomas, five-yr overall survival (OS) were 84±7% and 41±7% for hTERT(-) and hTERT(+) tumors, respectively (p=0.001). There was good correlation between telomerase activity and hTERT expression (κ=0.637). Multivariate analysis revealed hTERT expression to be the single most important predictor of survival of all known pathological, clinical and treatment factors (HR 60.4 (CI 6.4–561)). TRF measurement revealed lack of alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) and heterogenous telomere length in pediatric ependymomas. We observed a trend for better prognosis with telomere dysfunction manifested by shorter telomeres and positive γH2AX. Conclusions: This study suggest that telomere maintenance represents the first known biologic prognostic factor for intracranial ependymomas. Telomerase activity highlights the importance of senescence in carcinogenesis and a possible target for novel treatment approaches for the disease. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicTelomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence→French-language works237,207→