Understanding a Teacher’s Knowledge of Classroom Community (Comprendre la connaissance qu’une enseignante a de la communauté formée par sa classe)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT. Using primarily online interaction, we worked with a grade one teacher to help her develop an understanding of community in her own classroom. Using an interpretive interactionist methodology, we theorized four domains in her view of classroom community: trust, membership, power, and capacity. The teacher’s perceived success in creating community suggested the development of an adaptive community coming from a newfound ability to negotiate the contradictions inherent in each domain. Comprendre la connaissance qu’une enseignante a de la communaute formee par sa classe RESUME. Par le truchement principal de sessions interactives en ligne, nous avons aide une enseignante de premiere annee du primaire a perfectionner sa comprehension de la communaute formee par ses eleves. Selon une methode interactioniste interpretative, nous avons elabore une theorie axee sur quatre volets d’interpretation de la communaute formee par la classe : confiance, appartenance, pouvoir et capacite. Le succes que percoit l’enseignante sur le plan de la creation d’un esprit communautaire suggere la mise sur pied d’une communaute adaptative issue d’une nouvelle capacite a traiter les contradictions inherentes a chaque volet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.047 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".