Bibliographic record
Abstract
RgsuM.La retraite, et tout particulierement la retraite obligatoire, a pris de l'importance dans la politique gouvernementale du Canada.Cet article passe en revue et analyse la jurisprudence pertinente qui a t6 soigneusement formul&e, specialement par la Cour supreme du Canada, au cours des dernieres decennies.L'article considere brievement les decisions majeures survenues avant la Charte des droits et libertes dans les annees quatre-vingt, examine les changements intervenus en 1990 avec l'application de la Charte, analyse les developpements juridiques qui ont eu lieu au cours des cinq dernieres annes, et termine par une analyse des repercussions de ces changements juridiques sur les politiques gouvernementales.Nous maintenons que la Cour supreme a eu tort dans ses decisions initiales sur la Charte, qu'elle s'est appuy&e sur des raisonnements socio-economiques comportant des lacunes et n'a pas suffisamment pris en consideration les droits fondamentaux de la personne.Nous concluons que la retraite obligatoire est une forme de discrimination juridique et que la lutte contre les lois qui perpetuent la discrimination fond&e sur l'Age s'inscrit dans la droite ligne des efforts historiques pour batir une societe equitable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".