MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2226590694 · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00439

Design, Synthesis, Assembly, and Engineering of Peptoid Nanosheets

2016· article· en· W2226590694 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ellen J. Robertson, Alessia Battigelli, Caroline Proulx, Ranjan V. Mannige, Thomas K. Haxton, Lisa Yun, Stephen Whitelam, Ronald N. Zuckermann

Bibliographic record

VenueAccounts of Chemical Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicChemical Synthesis and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBasic Energy SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDefense Threat Reduction Agency
KeywordsPeptoidSupramolecular chemistryNanomaterialsPolymerNanotechnologyMaterials scienceSurface modificationMonomerCharacterization (materials science)Ionic bondingChemistryMoleculeIonOrganic chemistryPeptide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two-dimensional (2D) atomically defined organic nanomaterials are an important material class with broad applications. However, few general synthetic methods exist to produce such materials in high yields and to precisely functionalize them. One strategy to form ordered 2D organic nanomaterials is through the supramolecular assembly of sequence-defined synthetic polymers. Peptoids, one such class of polymer, are designable bioinspired heteropolymers whose main-chain length and monomer sequence can be precisely controlled. We have recently discovered that individual peptoid polymers with a simple sequence of alternating hydrophobic and ionic monomers can self-assemble into highly ordered, free-floating nanosheets. A detailed understanding of their molecular structure and supramolecular assembly dynamics provides a robust platform for the discovery of new classes of nanosheets with tunable properties and novel applications. In this Account, we discuss the discovery, characterization, assembly, molecular modeling, and functionalization of peptoid nanosheets. The fundamental properties of peptoid nanosheets, their mechanism of formation, and their application as robust scaffolds for molecular recognition and as templates for the growth of inorganic minerals have been probed by an arsenal of experimental characterization techniques (e.g., scanning probe, electron, and optical microscopy, X-ray diffraction, surface-selective vibrational spectroscopy, and surface tensiometry) and computational techniques (coarse-grained and atomistic modeling). Peptoid nanosheets are supramolecular assemblies of 16-42-mer chains that form molecular bilayers. They span tens of microns in lateral dimensions and freely float in water. Their component chains are highly ordered, with chains nearly fully extended and packed parallel to one another as a result of hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions. Nanosheets form via a novel interface-catalyzed monolayer collapse mechanism. Peptoid chains first assemble into a monolayer at either an air-water or oil-water interface, on which peptoid chains extend, order, and pack into a brick-like pattern. Upon mechanical compression of the interface, the monolayer buckles into stable bilayer structures. Recent work has focused on the design of nanosheets with tunable properties and functionality. They are readily engineerable, as functional monomers can be readily incorporated onto the nanosheet surface or into the interior. For example, functional hydrophilic "loops" have been displayed on the surfaces of nanosheets. These loops can interact with specific protein targets, serving as a potentially general platform for molecular recognition. Nanosheets can also bind metal ions and serve as 2D templates for mineral growth. Through our understanding of the formation mechanism, along with predicted features ascertained from molecular modeling, we aim to further design and synthesize nanosheets as robust protein mimetics with the potential for unprecedented functionality and stability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations192
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAccounts of Chemical ResearchSame topicChemical Synthesis and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207