O negro escravo em Sergipe: uma introdução ao seu estudo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESUMO A mestiçagem em Sergipe, com base em estatísticas da população de municípios, entre escravos e população livre, entre negros, brancos, índios, entre mestiços, pretos, brancos, é mostrada neste artigo, como conseqüência do que foram o açúcar e o escravo como a grande propriedade de Sergipe. Para isso, o artigo estabelece duas considerações principais: o da economia de Sergipe em termos de exportação e produção de açúcar e algodão, econômica, litorânea, colonial, escravista, e a organização agrária do Brasil colonial com seus elementos constitutivos, a grande propriedade, a monocultura e o trabalho escravo. ABSTRACT The negro slave in Sergipe: an introduction to his study. v. 16, n. 1, p. 45-56, jan./jun. 1988. The mixing of races in Sergipe, based on statistics of the communities population between slaves and free people, among negroes, white men and indians, among crossbreeds, black people, white ones, is shown in this article, as a consequence of what the sugar and the slave people were in relation to the great propriety of Sergipe. The Author establishes two main points: that of economy of Sergipe considering exploitation and the economic, coastal, colonial and slavery production of sugar and cotton and the Brazilian agrarian organization of Brazil as a colony in the past time with its constitutive elements, the great propriety, the monoculture and the slave work. RÉSUMÉ Le noir esclave à Sergipe: une introduction à son étude. v. 16, n. 1, p. 45-56, jan./jun. 1988. Le métissage dans l’Etat de Sergipe, selon les statistiques de la population des communes, entre les esclaves et la population libre, entre les noirs, les blancs et les indiens, entre les métis, les noirs et les blancs est montré dans cet article comme la conséquence de ce qui ont représenté le sucre et l’esclave vis à vis la grande propriété de l‘Etat de Sergipe. L’article fait deux considérations principales: l’une sur l’économie de Sergipe en terme d’exploitation et de production de sucre et de coton, une économie littorale, coloniale et esclavagiste, et l’autre sur l’organisation agraire du Brésil colonial, avec ses éléments constitutifs, la grande propriété, la monoculture et le travail de l’esclave.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".