New Ideas and Their Relation to Old Ideas: Trauma, Affect, and the Unrepresented
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Shadow of the Tsunami and the Growth of the Relational Mind by Philip M. Bromberg (New York: Routledge, 2011, 215 pp.) Unrepresented States and the Construction of Meaning: Clinical and Theoretical Contributions Edited by Howard B. Levine, Gail S. Reed, and Dominique Scarfone (London: Karnac, 2013, 287 pp.) The topic of trauma and dissociation, and borderline and other non-neurotic disorders in which psychic representation is missing or weak, have been one of the main, if not the leading, topics of psychoanalytic theorizing for many years now. The two books under consideration approach these topics from very different perspectives, yet find agreement in some key areas. I will begin with an exposition of some of the main ideas from each book, and will then discuss what the concepts developed by the authors can tell us about the present state of psychoanalytic theory and practice in relation to trauma, personality disorders, and their underlying causes, dynamics, and treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".