MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2226804662

DE ESTO Y AQUELLO. DISTINTIVO ADIAT.- ORALIDAD Y CULTURA

2015· article· es· W2226804662 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sin Autor

Bibliographic record

VenueGaceta UNAM (2010-2015) · 2015
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicScience, Technology, and Education in Latin America
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LA ASOCIACION MEXICANA DE DIRECTIVOS DE LA INVESTIGACION APLICADA Y EL DESARROLLO TECNOLOGICO AC (ADIAT) ENTREGO EL DISTINTIVO ADIAT AL RECTOR JOSE NARRO ROBLES, POR SU LABOR AL FRENTE DE LA UNAM. EN LA REUNION, CELEBRADA EN LA TORRE DE RECTORIA, SE DESTACO SU APORTACION AL SISTEMA NACIONAL DE CIENCIA Y TECNOLOGIA E INNOVACION, CON LA INICIATIVA HACIA UNA AGENDA NACIONAL DE CIENCIA, TECNOLOGIA E INNOVACION, QUE REUNIO A 61 INSTITUCIONES DE DIFERENTES SECTORES PARA GENERAR PROPUESTAS DE POLITICA PUBLICA QUE PROMUEVEN ESTOS CAMPOS. ADEMAS, PORQUE CONTRIBUYO A ORIENTAR EL TALENTO DE LOS INVESTIGADORES UNIVERSITARIOS A BUSCAR LA SOLUCION DE RETOS DEL DESARROLLO SOCIAL Y ECONOMICO DE MEXICO. SE AGRADECIO A NARRO ROBLES EL APOYO DADO A ESA ASOCIACION EN SU GESTION, PARA LA REALIZACION ANUAL DE LOS CONGRESOS Y, PARTICULARMENTE, POR HABER PRESIDIDO EL COMITE ORGANIZADOR DEL CONGRESO ADIAT 2011, EN MERIDA, YUCATAN.- EL INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES SOCIALES (IIS) Y LA FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS POLITICAS Y SOCIALES (FCPYS), FUERON COORGANIZADORES Y SEDES DEL III CONGRESO IBEROAMERICANO DE ESTUDIOS SOBRE ORALIDAD. ORALIDAD Y CULTURA. MANUEL PERLO COHEN, DIRECTOR DE LA PRIMERA ENTIDAD, CONSIDERO QUE LO ENUNCIADO ES UNA FORMA DE COMUNICACION QUE SE TIENE QUE MANTENER, PROPICIAR Y LLEVARSE A ESCUELAS, PUES ESCUCHAR Y CONTAR CUENTOS, HISTORIAS Y LEYENDAS ES PARTE DE UNA CULTURA QUE NO DEBE PERDERSE. COMO LAS VERSIONES ANTERIORES, ESTA FUE ORGANIZADA POR LA RED IBEROAMERICANA SOBRE ORALIDAD, QUE ADEMAS DE CONTAR CON ACADEMICOS DE LA REGION, INCLUYO A EXPERTOS DE CANADA Y FRANCIA. “FUE UN EVENTO COMPLETO, CON REPRESENTANTES INTERNACIONALES. ADEMAS, LOS ESTUDIANTES TUVIERON ACCESO A LAS INDAGACIONES Y TRABAJOS MAS RECIENTES SOBRE EL TEMA”, PRECISO. LA FORMA COTIDIANA DE EXPRESARNOS, CON TODAS SUS IMPLICACIONES, SE PIERDE EN MUCHOS LUGARES. PARA LO IMPERSONAL LA ORALIDAD ES FUNDAMENTAL; LOS ESTUDIOS AL RESPECTO, A DECIR DE PERLO, RECIBEN POCA ATENCION Y ESTAN SOMETIDOS A TRANSFORMACIONES SIGNIFICATIVAS, “POR ELLO SON IMPORTANTES ESTE TIPO DE INICIATIVAS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.591
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGaceta UNAM (2010-2015)Same topicScience, Technology, and Education in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207