Effects of gastric bypass on FoxO1 expression in the liver and pancreas of diabetic rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: To explore the mechanism by which gastric bypass surgery (GBS) ameliorates type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) by investigating whether FoxO1 (a transcription factor that plays a crucial role in the regulation of glycolipid metabolism) expression is altered in the liver and pancreatic islet cells in a rat model of GBS-treated T2DM. METHODS: Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into four groups (n = 10 rats each): diabetic rats treated by GBS (DM + GBS), diabetic rats subjected to sham operation (DM + sham), normal control rats (control), and diabetic rats without surgery (DM). Fasting levels of blood glucose (BG), insulin, and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) were measured in all groups before and 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks after operation. Rats were killed 24 weeks after surgery. Liver and pancreas expressions of FoxO1 were investigated by immunohistochemistry and Western blotting analyses. RESULTS: In the DM + GBS group, fasting BG before and 24 weeks after surgery decreased from 20.2 ± 2.1 to 7.7 ± 1.1 mmol/L, respectively; fasting insulin showed no change (2.9 ± 0.1 and 3.0 ± 0.1 mU/L, respectively); and fasting GLP-1 increased from 8.7 ± 0.9 to 23.5 ± 0.2 pmol/L, respectively. Fasting BG levels after surgery in the DM + GBS group were significantly lower than those in the DM + sham and DM groups. FoxO1 expression levels in the liver and pancreatic islets of the DM + GBS group were reduced compared to those in the DM + sham and DM groups. FoxO1 in the pancreatic β-cells was expressed mainly in the cytoplasm. CONCLUSIONS: Gastric bypass may improve type 2 diabetes mellitus by changing FoxO1 expression in the liver and pancreatic islet cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".