MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W222709736

Effective Veterinary Practice

2002· article· en· W222709736 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ken L. Mould

Bibliographic record

VenueEurope PMC (PubMed Central) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicVeterinary Practice and Education Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSurpriseThe InternetScope (computer science)Work (physics)Computer scienceProfitability indexParagraphBest practiceWorld Wide WebPublic relationsBusinessPolitical scienceEngineeringSociologyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canadian veterinarians will be pleased to know that a reference on practice management, authored by a Canadian and with a meaningful Canadian perspective, is now available. Although much of the material in this 400-page book has been presented elsewhere in veterinary management literature, it is the way in which the material is presented and referenced in this book that makes it especially effective. Each of the 12 chapters starts with an in-hospital scenario that exposes management problems with which the reader can quickly identify. Subsequently, the means of rectifying the problems are discussed with highlighted key phrases and point summaries that help to keep the reader on track. At the end of each chapter, there are work sheets that allow the reader to transfer from theory to practice. The author has been a pioneer in innovative veterinary continuing education. It should come as no surprise, therefore, that an included CD-ROM (extra fee to “unlock”) exists to supplement the written text. It includes the chapter work sheets to allow for modification and personalization, and it expands the written text to assist in the development of business plans, hospital manuals, job descriptions, etc. The practice internet module on the CD is a direct link to some 350 internet sites. Therefore, the appended resources in both the written text and on CD yield a wealth of additional information. The scope of management topics covered is comprehensive. The section on Business Planning includes a review of the financial statement and the important indices within. Key profitability, productivity, and cost control benchmarks are discussed, and current survey data are included. The information relates to small animal, large animal, and mixed practices. The chapter on People Management stresses the importance of adequate job descriptions, work appraisals, motivation, continuing education, etc. It then supplies the tools of implementation by way of work sheets and templates. There are chapters on communication, both internal and external, and marketing of veterinary practice. There is considerable discussion of the Human-Animal Bond. The authors commitment to the topic is evidenced by the statement: “The human-animal bond must be first and foremost in the eyes of the client of a veterinary practice. This is the ultimate marketing message for the 21st century.” Effective Veterinary Practice suggests to me that it is the way that more books will be formatted in the future; namely, written text interwoven with the “cool” media of internet and CD-ROM to allow information to remain current and relevant to the reader's individual interests and needs. In summary, Effective Veterinary Practice both challenges and assists veterinarians and their staff in making the transition from default to design management, where the impact of leadership and team involvement can be felt and its fruits harvested.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.007
Scholarly communication0.0110.004
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0710.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.178
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEurope PMC (PubMed Central)Same topicVeterinary Practice and Education StudiesFrench-language works237,207