A CR1 element is embedded in a novel tandem repeat (<i>Hin</i>fI repeat) within the chicken genome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Highly repetitive DNA sequences constitute a significant portion of most eukaryotic genomes, raising questions about their evolutionary origins and amplification dynamics. In this study, a novel chicken repetitive DNA family, the HinfI repeat, was characterized. The basic repeating unit of this family displays a uniform length of 770 bp, which was defined by the recognition site of HinfI. The HinfI repeat was specifically localized in the pericentric region of chromosome 4 by fluorescence in situ hybridization and constitutes 0.51% of the chicken genome. Interestingly, a chicken repeat 1 (CR1) element has been identified within this basic repeating unit. Like other CR1 elements, this CR1 element also displays typical retrotransposition characteristics, including a highly conserved 3' region and a badly truncated 5' end. This direct evidence from sequence analysis, together with our Southern blot results, suggests that the HinfI repeat may originate from a unique region containing a retrotransposed CR1 element.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".