Bibliographic record
Abstract
I was leading two lives that year; set against each other, they suggested a painless but mocking harmony.In Ballygunge I was the dutiful relative who paid Sunday morning visits to the family, ate rice and curried delicacies with her fingers, and sat on the edge of a bed gossiping with aunts or listening to the Bournevita Quiz on All-India Radio.But in downtown Calcutta, especially on Park Street or Chowringee, I was the Indian memsahib with a white escort to be lewdly stared at, or to be whispered good day to by elevator-boy-pimps. -Mukherjee 239In her autobiographical narrative, Days and Nights in Calcutta, Bharati Mukherjee explores the cultural tensions implicit in her life as a privileged Indian woman who returns to her homeland after becoming a Canadian citizen.Her Canadian husband and coauthor, Clark Blaise, attempts to understand the traditions and the emerging political tensions of his wifes native land.Separated into two sections, the book is an unromanticised, raw, humorous, spiritual, political and personal account of an India experiencing growing pains in 1973 as it deals with the clashes between traditionalism and the insurgence of Western capitalism.Contained within the narratives are the writers thoughts and observations on topics ranging from class conflict to feminism, from racism to personal enlightenment.Told from the perspective of a native Indian and a native Canadian, the book offers independent portrayals of India from both Eastern and Western perspectives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".