MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2227833737 · doi:10.2495/air030041

Fuzzy Logic Modelling Of Air Pollution During Chinook Winds

2003· article· en· W2227833737 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
R. Mintz, B.R. Young, William Y. Svrcek

Bibliographic record

VenueWIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWind speedChinook windEnvironmental scienceMeteorologySnowHumidityAir pollutionPollutionClimatologyWind directionAtmospheric sciencesGeographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The occurrence of Foehn winds in the city of Calgary is due to the nearby proximity of the Canadian Rocky Mountains. The Foehn winds bring warm weather during the winter months and are described locally as Chinooks, a Blackfoot Indian term meaning snow eaters. Despite the increased wind speed during a Chinook, air pollution levels increase. A novel approach to modeling air pollution during a Chinook was developed using fuzzy logic. The Fuzzy c-Means method for system classification was used to identify the Foehn wind. As well, Modified Learning from Examples was used to predict surface ozone concentration. The identification of the occurrence of the Chinook wind was based on changes in humidity, and temperature increase. Key factors in air pollution for Calgary are ventiIation components such as wind speed. The new hzzy logic model developed in this work predicts the ozone concentration based on hourly wind speed and wind direction. The new model shows good agreement with the data and captures the trends in ozone concentration during Foehn wind conditions. Furthermore, this work shows that hzzy logic can be a powerful tool in air pollution modeling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score0.339

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWIT Transactions on Ecology and the EnvironmentSame topicAir Quality Monitoring and ForecastingFrench-language works237,207