MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2227894554 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-0815-4_18

Ethylene and Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants

2011· book-chapter· en· W2227894554 on OpenAlexaff
Elisa Gamalero, Bernard R. Glick

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant responses to water stress
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbiotic stressPlant growthBiomass (ecology)Abiotic componentSalinityGerminationEthyleneBiologyHorticultureBotanyAgronomyBiochemistryEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plants are commonly exposed to large number of different environmental stresses including extremes of pH and temperature, flooding, drought, high salt, both organic and inorganic contaminants, and a variety of pathogenic organisms. As a consequence of these environmental stresses, plants typically synthesize increased levels of the phytohormone ethylene and are often unable to grow and proliferate to any great extent, at least until the stress is removed and the ethylene level is lowered. To reduce the deleterious effects of ethylene stress, plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) that facilitate the proliferation of plants under stress conditions may be added to the system. These bacteria lower the level of growth inhibiting stress ethylene within the plant through the action of the enzyme ACC deaminase, and are also able to directly promote plant growth, usually by providing the plant with the phytohormone indoleacetic. The net result of adding PGPB to plants is a significant increase in both the number of seeds that germinate and the amount of biomass that the plants are able to attain under otherwise stressful and inhibitory conditions. In this chapter we provide a detailed overview regarding the functioning, the biochemistry and the regulation of ACC deaminase, with emphasis on application of PGPB synthesizing this enzyme and supporting plant growth under abiotic stress such as salinity, flooding, drought, organic, and inorganic pollution. Finally, recent developments on the exploitation of transgenic plants expressing ACC deaminase are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations93
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlant responses to water stressFrench-language works237,207