MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 18701: Frequency and Contributing Factors to Diaphragm Paresis Following Pediatric Cardiac Surgery

2014· article· en· W2227899992 on OpenAlexaff
I. Zafurallah, Osami Honjo, Peter C. Laussen, Cathy MacDonald, Alejandro A. Floh

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineParesisDiaphragm (acoustics)SurgeryCardiologyAnesthesiaInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Diaphragm paresis can occur as a complication of pediatric cardiac surgery that can prolong ventilation and length of ICU stay. Diaphragm plication (DP) may be necessary to improve respiratory mechanics and decrease duration of ventilation support. Early identification of patients who are likely to benefit from DP has not been studied. Methods: Patients at our institution diagnosed with diaphragm paresis between 2002 - 2012 were identified. Mode of diagnosis, demographics, operative procedures during index admission, and intervals of care were evaluated. Associations between predictors and DP were assessed by univariable and multivariable logistic regressions. Results: Diaphragm paresis was diagnosed in 161 patients following 6448 index surgeries, of whom 31 (19%) underwent DP (DP+). Paresis was diagnosed by ultrasound in 160 (99%) subjects at a median (IQR) time from surgery of 7 (3, 11) days in DP+ vs 10 (6, 19) days in DP- (p=0.02). DP was completed after a median (IQR) of 4 (1, 17) days after diagnosis. DP+ were younger in age [median (IQR) days DP+ 42 (14, 84) vs DP- 168 (28, 784); p<0.001], underwent surgery of higher RACHS-1 score [DP+ 3 (3, 4) vs DP- 3 (2, 4); p=0.02], and had a higher rate of hypothermic circulatory arrest [DP+ 14 (45%) vs DP- 23 (18%); p=0.001]. DP+ subjects had a rate of single ventricle physiology (32%), median sternotomy (94%), and bypass (87%) similar to DP- subjects. Only younger age (OR 1.003 per day, p=0.02) and use of hypothermic circulatory arrest (OR 3.06, p=0.01) remained significant on multivariable modeling. DP+ subjects had longer duration of ventilator support [DP+ 15 (9, 30) vs DP- 6.5 (3, 12.5) days; p<0.001] and ICU admission [DP+ 23 (18, 42) vs DP- 8 (5, 17) days; p<0.001]. However, ventilation was discontinued after a median of 1 (1,2) day after plication. The time interval from index surgery to diagnosis (EST 0.91, p<0.0001) and interval from diagnosis to DP (EST 0.94, p<0.0001; r2=0.91) were associated with a longer ICU stay even after adjusting for age and bypass time. Conclusion: Diaphragm paresis is common after congenital heart surgery. Earlier diagnosis and plication may shorten length of ventilation support and ICU stay, particularly in younger patients. Long-term outcome studies following DP are required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCongenital Heart Disease Studies→French-language works237,207→