MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2227961447

Investigating androgen receptor antagonism by structural analyses, molecular dynamics simulations and support vector machines

2007· article· en· W2227961447 on OpenAlexaff
Jian Wu, Bing Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAndrogen receptorAgonistChemistryAntagonistProstate cancerAntiandrogenReceptorAndrogenPharmacologyInternal medicineBiologyHormoneCancerMedicineBiochemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AACR Annual Meeting-- Apr 14-18, 2007; Los Angeles, CA 4426 To date, it is well established that androgen receptor (AR) is over-expressed in vast majority of the hormone-refractory prostate cancer and remains active through mechanisms that are refractory to androgen deprivation therapy. It has been found that AR must bind its ligand to confer hormone-refractory growth, indicating that AR remains to be a key therapeutic target for advanced prostate cancer. Accumulating biochemical data indicate antagonist profiles of antiandrogens could be changed by point mutations in AR ligand-binding domain (AR-LBD). For example, hydroxyflutamide is an antagonist for wild type AR, but an agonist for the T877A mutant. Despite crystal structures of a series of agonist-like AR-LBD are available, detailed structural mechanism by which T877A mutation results in antagonist-agonist conversion of hydroxyflutamide is unknown. Fortunately, given the structural and functional conservation among nuclear receptors, structural studies of the other family members could shed light on the AR antagonism. In this work, we have investigated AR antagonism by combining structural analyses, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and support vector machines (SVM) method. First, we performed comparative structural analyses of ERα-LBD/agonist and ERα-LBD/antagonist structures. Our analyses indicated that residues D351 and L354 are critical for the antagonistic activity of ERα ligand, which were termed ‘switch residues’; Second, based on crystal structures of AR-LBD in complex with agonists containing various chemical scaffolds, we have detected a ‘soft spot’ inside the wall of AR hormone-binding pocket, which could be exploited to design novel AR antagonists with enhanced specificity and affinity; Third, by MD simulations, we showed T877A mutation result in significant change in distance between E709 and L712, which are the corresponding AR residues of ERα D351 and L354, respectively. This suggests a possible structural mechanism by which the T877A mutation results in the antagonist-agonist conversion of hydroxyflutamide; Next, to gain insights about the correlation between ligand binding modes and the helix-12 positioning, we have trained the SVM model by a dataset composed of ER/agonist, ER/antagonist and AR/agonist structures. Molecular descriptors used in the SVM include electrostatic complementarity, shape complementarity, hydrophilic interactions, surface fit rate as well as interaction between ligand and switch residues. The SVM model was subsequently used to classify a test dataset into antagonist-like or agonist-like structures solely based on the molecular descriptors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of our SVM model is 0.898. These studies allow us to propose a pharmacophore model for AR antagonists, shedding light on further development of novel antiandrogens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.466
Teacher spread0.388 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→