MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W222817932

MARKET BASKET SURVEY OF SELECTED METALS IN FRUITS FROM KARACHI CITY (PAKISTAN)

2009· article· en· W222817932 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Erum Zahir, Iftikhar Imam Naqvi, Sheikh Mohi Uddin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Basic & Applied Sciences · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicHeavy Metals in Plants
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtomic absorption spectroscopyNitric acidChemistryPerchloric acidHeavy metalsEnvironmental chemistryMetalTrace metalNuclear chemistryMetallurgyMaterials scienceInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Metals are essential for important biochemical and physiological functions and are necessary for maintaining health throughout life. In order to assess the impact of human activity on the food chain, monitoring of trace metals in a variety of fruits being sold in Karachi’s metropolis has been focus of this study. Trace levels of heavy metals such as Fe, Mn, Pb, Cu, Co, Ni, Cd, Cr and Zn were determined in 10 different varieties of fruits purchased from local market of Karachi city of Pakistan. The dried powdered samples were digested in 1: 3 mixtures of Perchloric acid (HClO 4) and Nitric acid (HNO 3) and metal levels were analyzed by using atomic absorption spectrophotometer. The results were in the range of 7.924-24.674 ug/g Fe, 0.531-7.571 ug/g Pb, 0.013-0.612 ug/g Mn, 0.543-3.234 ug/g Cu, 0.144-5.033 ug/g Ni, 0.1730.299 ug/g Cd, 3.268-4.343 ug/g Cr, 0.138-21.409 ug/g Zn, 0.104-1.168 ug/g Co.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Basic & Applied SciencesSame topicHeavy Metals in PlantsFrench-language works237,207