MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

XI CONGRESSO INTERNACIONAL DA ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE ESTUDOS CANADENSES 20 ANOS DE INTERFACES BRASIL-CANADÁ.

2012· article· pt· W2228811369 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2012
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicScience and Science Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Os dez anos da Interfaces Brasil/Canadá, revista oficial da ABECAN, coincidem com a comemoração dos 20 anos da Associação Brasileira de Estudos Canadenses, datas celebradas nesta edição. Traçamos brevemente aqui a trajetória da revista, versões impres- sa e on-line, focalizando seus pontos mais importantes, algumas lacunas, seus principais protagonistas, e algumas metas a serem alcançadas.Palavras-chave: Interfaces Brasil/Canadá, revista oficial da Abecan, versão escrita, versão on-lineAbstract: The ten years of Interfaces Brasil/Canadá, the official journal of ABECAN, coincides with the celebration of twenty years of the Brazilian Association of Canadian Studies, both dates celebrated in this issue. We briefly trace here the trajectory of the publication on its printed and online versions, focusing on the strongest points and some omissions, its main protagonists and some of the goals to be achieved.Keywords: Interfaces Brasil/Canadá, Abecan official journal, printed version, on-line versionRésumé: Les dix ans d’Interfaces Brasil/Canadá, revue officielle de l’ABECAN, coïncident avec la commémoration des vingt ans de l’Association brésilienne d’études canadiennes, dates célébrées dans cette édition. Nous traçons brièvement ici la trajectoire de la revue, versions écrite et on-line, tout en focalisant ses points plus importants, quelques lacunes, ses principaux protagonistes, voire quelques buts à atteindre.Mots-clés: Interfaces Brasil/Canadá, revue officielle de l’Abecan, version écrite, version on-line

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.682
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it