MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2229304104 · doi:10.7870/cjcmh-2000-0005

Perceptions, Stratégies Adaptatives Et Attentes Des Femmes Agées Aidantes Familiales Dans La Perspective Du Virage Ambulatoire

2000· article· fr· W2229304104 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Francine Ducharme, Guilhème Pérodeau, Denise Trudeau

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Community Mental Health · 2000
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Systems and Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en OutaouaisUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerceptionCoping (psychology)PsychologySpouseHealth careNursingQualitative researchFocus groupExploratory researchGerontologyMedicineSociologyClinical psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents the results of an exploratory study funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. The objectives of this research were to explore (a) the perception by elderly women caregivers of the shift to ambulatory care; (b) their use of coping behaviours in the face of this major change within the health care system; and (c) their perceptions of health care services. In a theoretical framework of stress and coping, and using standardized questionnaires and open-ended questions, 40 home interviews were initially conducted with elderly women, each of whom was caring for her spouse after his discharge from hospital. Additional data were collected through focus groups. Quantitative and qualitative analyses revealed that elderly women caregivers perceive ambulatory care in a positive manner and as a change involving challenges only when they feel in control of the health care situation and when the care does not necessitate specialized abilities. When the care to be provided is complex and requires continued involvement and specific competence on the caregiver's part, the situation results in insecurity for elderly women. Caregivers use cognitive coping strategies to deal with their problems and are not inclined to use formal services in their social support network. Participants in this study wished to be better informed about the health care system in general ("how the system works") so that they could acquire a sense of predictability. Other expectations of elderly women caregivers concerned the importance of continuity in health services delivery, better preparation for the transition from hospital to home and availability of psychological support for themselves. These results suggest a critical analysis of the present paradigm guiding health care services, in which family caregivers are considered as resources or coworkers instead of coclients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.139
GPT teacher head0.448
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2000
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Community Mental HealthSame topicHealthcare Systems and PracticesFrench-language works237,207