Perceptions, Stratégies Adaptatives Et Attentes Des Femmes Agées Aidantes Familiales Dans La Perspective Du Virage Ambulatoire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents the results of an exploratory study funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. The objectives of this research were to explore (a) the perception by elderly women caregivers of the shift to ambulatory care; (b) their use of coping behaviours in the face of this major change within the health care system; and (c) their perceptions of health care services. In a theoretical framework of stress and coping, and using standardized questionnaires and open-ended questions, 40 home interviews were initially conducted with elderly women, each of whom was caring for her spouse after his discharge from hospital. Additional data were collected through focus groups. Quantitative and qualitative analyses revealed that elderly women caregivers perceive ambulatory care in a positive manner and as a change involving challenges only when they feel in control of the health care situation and when the care does not necessitate specialized abilities. When the care to be provided is complex and requires continued involvement and specific competence on the caregiver's part, the situation results in insecurity for elderly women. Caregivers use cognitive coping strategies to deal with their problems and are not inclined to use formal services in their social support network. Participants in this study wished to be better informed about the health care system in general ("how the system works") so that they could acquire a sense of predictability. Other expectations of elderly women caregivers concerned the importance of continuity in health services delivery, better preparation for the transition from hospital to home and availability of psychological support for themselves. These results suggest a critical analysis of the present paradigm guiding health care services, in which family caregivers are considered as resources or coworkers instead of coclients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".