MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2229978964 · doi:10.1152/jappl.2001.90.3.1083

Physiological and mechanical adaptation of periarticular cancellous bone after joint ligament injury

2001· article· en· W2229978964 on OpenAlexaff
Roxane C. Shymkiw, Robert C. Bray, Steven K. Boyd, Apostolos Kantzas, Ronald F. Zernicke

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physiology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicKnee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnterior cruciate ligamentBlood flowBone mineralAnatomyCancellous boneLigamentFEMORAL CONDYLEBone densityOsteoporosisInternal medicineCartilage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The relation between blood flow and bone mineral density (BMD) of periarticular bone was examined in an in vivo model of joint instability. Eighty mature New Zealand White rabbits were randomly assigned to experimental [anterior cruciate ligament transection (ACLX)], sham-operated control, or age-matched normal control groups. Experimental rabbits underwent unilateral transection of the right anterior cruciate ligament, and the nonoperated left [contralateral (Cntra)] limb was a within-animal control. BMD and blood flow to the periarticular bone in the femoral condyles were assessed in each group at 2, 4, 6, 14, and 48 wk postsurgery, using quantitative computed tomography scanning and entrapment of colored microspheres. BMD was significantly lower (5%) in the ACLX compared with Cntra limbs. Periarticular bone blood flow in the ACLX limbs was significantly greater than in the Cntra limb (29%) in the early stages (6 wk) after injury. Up to 48 wk post-ACLX, a significant correlation was found between increased blood flow and decreased BMD in the periarticular bone of the femoral condyles in the ACLX limbs. This correlation suggested that heightened blood flow may be linked to mechanisms of bone adaptation in joints after ligament injury.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysiologySame topicKnee injuries and reconstruction techniquesFrench-language works237,207