MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2230083594

[Molecular and phenotypic characterization of a VGII genotype Cryptococcus gattii XH91 isolated in China].

2010· article· en· W2230083594 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xiaobo Feng, Jingsong Wu, Ling Bo, Daming Ren, Zhirong Yao

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCryptococcus gattiiBiologyGenotypeMating typeMultilocus sequence typingSerotypeStrain (injury)MatingGeneticsLocus (genetics)TypingGeneCryptococcusVirologyAnatomy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the molecular and phenotypic traits of the VGII genotype of Cryptococcus gattii isolate XH91 firstly isolated in China. METHODS: The serotype was identified by molecular method; multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) was performed based on 16 gene fragments both of nuclear and mitochondria genomes; the abilities of haploid fruiting, same-sex mating and opposite sex mating were all evaluated; the phenotypic traits including melanin production, capsule size, and growth at 37 degrees C were characterized. RESULTS: The isolate XH91 firstly isolated in China was serotype B. The isolate shared the same MLST genotype with the minor outbreak genotype VGIIb from Vancouver islands. Strain XH91 could mate with the reference strain of opposite mating type and produced basidiospores, but could not mate with the reference strain of same mating type and had no ability of haploid fruiting. We did not observe obvious difference between XH91 and reference strains for melanin production, capsule size, and growth at 37 degrees C. CONCLUSION: Based on the results from MLST and phenotypic analysis, the Cryptococcus gattii strain XH91 is identical with the minor outbreak genotype VGIIb from Vancouver islands. This study will be critical to gain further insight into the emergence and molecular epidemiology of the VGII genotype of Cryptococcus gattii from China.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→French-language works237,207→