Interpreting <scp>DTBZ</scp> binding data in rodent: Inherent variability and compensation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
[11C]-dihydrotetrabenazine (DTBZ) Positron Emission Tomography was used to evaluate the vesicular monoamine transporter type 2 as an index of dopaminergic function in the striatum of adult Sprague-Dawley rats obtained from two different animal sources (Charles River Laboratories [CR] or UBC's Animal Care Centre [ACC]) and later submitted to two different unilateral lesions of the nigro-striatal pathway. The results showed a significant difference in the striatal binding potential (BP(ND)) at baseline (before lesioning) between the CR and ACC groups providing evidence that the origin of the animals, possibly due to differences in early environmental factors or breeding conditions associated with different animal vendors plays a role in the development of the adult dopaminergic system. Further, in both animal models, an increase in DTBZ BP(ND) was observed, after unilateral intervention, in the striatum contralateral to the lesion, likely reflecting compensatory effects. Based on these findings, we conclude that in unilateral models, the unlesioned side/hemisphere may not be an appropriate control and that care should be taken to control for the origin of the animals in any given study, especially in longitudinal and replication studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".