MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2231304699 · doi:10.4271/2007-01-3323

FENSAP-ICE Modeling of the Ice Particle Threat to Engines in Flight

2007· article· en· W2231304699 on OpenAlexafffund
Xavier Veillard, Cristhian Aliaga, Wagdi G. Habashi

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIcing and De-icing Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsAerospace engineeringAeronauticsComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<div class="htmlview paragraph">A series of turbofan engine malfunctions characterized by flameout and rollbacks at high altitudes have been reported and analyzed by flight safety agencies and concerned industries<sup><span class="xref">1</span></sup>. Conclusions pointed the source of these incidents to be an ice accretion build-up in the low-pressure compressor of the turbofan explained by the presence of ice crystals in the flying environment. In order to provide a numerical tool to analyze such situations, a new capability is developed within FENSAP-ICE<sup><span class="xref">2</span></sup> that provides an unsteady model for ice crystals accretion in jet engines. The first step of this study is concentrated on adapting FENSAP-ICE to turbomachinery problems. A 3D unsteady parallel approach for rotor-stator interaction is developed, allowing the treatment of multi-stage blade motion in mixed relative and absolute frames of reference via a finite element interpolation method at interfaces<sup><span class="xref">3</span></sup>. The approach is demonstrated using the NASA compressor stage 35. As a first approximation, physical correlations of ice crystals are substituted in the droplet module of FENSAP-ICE, DROP3D, to obtain the unsteady ice crystals impingement zones in a turbomachinery stage, using flux-based collection efficiency. Particular attention is paid to the effects of unsteady rotor-stator interaction across the crystals’ trajectories.</div>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesSame topicIcing and De-icing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207