A phase I trial of PS-341 and fludarabine for relapsed and refractory indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
7580 Background: The safety and efficacy of PS-341 (bortezomib) as a single agent in relapsed and refractory hematologic malignancies has been well documented. Fludarabine is known to be active in indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). PS-341 may potentiate fludarabine activity by inhibiting DNA repair and inducing apoptosis in Bcl-2 over-expressing cells. The safety of this combination was evaluated in an ongoing phase I study. An additional dose level including rituxumab has been added to potentially improve efficacy without significant additional toxicity. Methods: Dose levels were as outlined in the table below. Each cycle was 21 days. Results: To date, 13 patients have received at least one cycle of treatment and are evaluable for toxicity. Diagnoses of patients included CLL, Waldenstom’s macroglobulinemia and MALT, lymphoplasmacytoid, mantle cell and follicular lymphomas. Patients received a median of 3 prior treatments (range 1–6). DLT’s were not observed in the first 4 dose levels, however the first patient on dose level 5 experienced grade 4 neutropenia. Three patients had doses of PS-341 held due to toxicity (2 due to neuropathy and one leukopenia; doses were held during cycles 3, 4 and 2 respectively) and two required dose reductions for grade 2 neuropathy (on cycles 2 and 3). One CRu has been documented (follicular lymphoma), 1 PR (mantle cell) and 6 patients with SD for 1.5 to 3 months. One patient was taken off the study with disease progression after 1 cycle (CLL) and two discontinued treatment due to prolonged cytopenias (MCL) and patient decision. The most 2 most recent patients are not yet evaluable for response. Conclusions: Combination PS-341 and fludarabine appears to be well-tolerated and active in relapsed and refractory NHL and CLL. Enrollment and follow-up of patients on level 5 (addition of rituxan) continues. Initiation of a phase II study of this regimen is anticipated shortly. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".