MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2231658481 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofu052.738

1030Temporal trends of infectious complications following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy at a Canadian tertiary cancer center

2014· article· en· W2231658481 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ibrahim Al Busaidi, Jerome A. Leis, Wayne L. Gold, Allison McGeer, Ants Toi

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTertiary careProstate cancerRadiologyUltrasoundCenter (category theory)CancerBiopsyGeneral surgeryMedical physicsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. Antimicrobial prophylaxis prior to transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy reduces the risk of infectious complications. Despite increasing E. coli resistance to fluoroquinolones, oral ciprofloxacin remains the most widely used agent for this indication. We reviewed the temporal trends of infection-related complications following TRUS-guided prostate biopsy at Princess Margaret Cancer Center, a Canadian tertiary care hospital where ciprofloxacin prophylaxis is used. Methods. Surveillance for complications following TRUS-guided prostate biopsy at our center has been conducted since 2003. Complications that occurred within 30-days of the procedure were included. Definite infections were defined as either a positive blood or urine culture in a patient meeting National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) criteria for bloodstream or urinary tract infection, respectively. Possible infections were defined as empiric treatment for cystitis, pyelonephritis, prostatitis, epididymo-orchitis, or sepsis without culture confirmation. Results. Of 19279 men who underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy between 2003 and 2013, 159 (0.8%) developed infectious complications. Between 2006 and 2013, definite urinary tract infection increased from 0.05% to 0.8% (p < .0001); bloodstream infections increased from 0.1% to 0.6% (p < 0.0001); and overall infections, including definite and possible infections, increased from 0.3% to 1.9% (p < .0001) (Figure). E. coli represented (85/89) 95% of isolates from urine and blood cultures of which 93% were resistant to ciprofloxacin. Resistance of E. coli to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, gentamicin, cefazolin, ceftriaxone, and nitrofurantoin was 58%, 42%, 33%, 32%, and 8%, respectively. Conclusion. The proportion of TRUS-guided prostate biopsies associated with infectious complications has increased significantly over the past decade, likely driven by the emergence of E. coli resistance to ciprofloxacin. Emerging antibiotic resistance may make current prophylaxis strategies with ciprofloxacin less effective, emphasizing the need for prospective evaluation of other prophylactic regimens and other non-antibiotic prevention strategies. Disclosures. All authors: No reported disclosures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207