Correlation between Theoretical and Experimental Specific Surface Area Estimation for PANI and PANI (Zr) Composite
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polyaniline (PANI) and polyaniline/Zr (PANI/Zr) powders have been prepared by in situ polymerization method, and the morphology, structure and pore structure are investigated. Quantum-chemical calculations showed that the polyaniline structure formed with zirconium ions is not globular, but fiber-like, and its fiber patterns are characterized by clear orientation of individual fragments Estimation of the theoretical and experimental specific surface area of the PANI/Zr composite is done. It is shown that the most preferred is the fiber-like structure with the specific surface area about 128-162 m2/g, which stability may be improved by using zirconium (IV) containing substances as a dopant. Experimental specific surface area is 66.8 and 146.05 m2/g for PANI and PANI/Zr, respectively. Correlation between theoretical and experimental specific surface area PANI/Zr composite is observed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".