Bibliographic record
Abstract
International interest in children's rights and in official child dvocacy agencies responsible for pomoting the rights and voices of children is increasing. This article examines the conventional wisdom on factors that enhance the impact of these agencies. It does so through a stucly on the impact of provincial child dvocacy offices in Canada. In line with conventional wisdom, the findings show that, in general, a higher level of impact is associated with offices that are independent from government, exclusively focused on children, accessible to children, and that have a wide marulute, strong statutory powers, and a broad advocacy function. But what also is suggested in the findings is the importance of a factor not given attention in the conventional wisdom - slcillful ledership in the context of a receptive political culture. In conjzinction with or in the absence of othe~ facilitating factors, leadership in a supportive political environment can play a significant role in acluancing the rights of children. On assiste dans le monde entier h un regain d'inte'rzt pour les h i t s des enfants et les organismes de &fense de l'enfance qui sont responsables de la promotion des droits et de la voix des enfants. Duns cet article, on examine les ide'es resues sur les facteurs qui rehaussent l'influence de ces organismes et, notamment, par une e'tucle sur l'influence des organismes provinciaux de de'fense de l'enfance au C a d . A l'instar des ide'es repes, l'e'tude conclut qu'un niveau plus ileue' d'injluence est observe' dans les organismes qui sont indipendants des pouvoirs publics, exclusivement axes sur les enfants, accessibles aux enfants, et cew qui ont un waste mandat, lles robustes pouwoirs statutuires et une ample fonction de repr6sentation. Cependant, les re'sultuts montrent aussi l'importunce d'un facteur qui n'a pas suscite' lJmt6rZt des wues traditionnelles : le leadership awist! dans le contexte d'une culture politique re'ceptiwe. Une lles conclusions tire'es weut qw conjointernent awec, ou en l'absence, d'autres fucteurs facilitateurs, le ledership peut jouer un r8le iml~ortandt ans la promotion des droits lles enfants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".