MODEC — Modeling and Detecting Evolutions of Communities
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Social network analysis encompasses the study of networked data and examines questions related to structures and patterns that can lead to the understanding of the data and the intrinsic relationships, such as identifying influential nodes, recognizing critical paths, predicting unobserved relationships, discovering communities, etc. All of these analyses, germane to a variety of application domains, are typically done on static information networks; that is, a fixed snapshot of the information network. Yet, a social network changes and understanding the evolution of the network and detecting these changes in the underlying structures is paramount for a multitude of applications. Looking at networks as fixed snapshots misses the opportunity to capture the evolutionary patterns. In this paper, we present a framework for modeling community evolution in social networks by tracking of events related to the life cycle of a community. We illustrate the capabilities of our framework by applying it to real datasets and validate the results using topics extracted from the tracked communities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it