MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A phase II trial of oblimersen sodium (G3139) in combination with doxorubicin (DOX) in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). NCI protocol # 5798

2006· article· en· W2232535406 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer J. Knox, E. Chen, Ronald Feld, M. Nematollahi, Gregory R. Pond, R. Cheiken, Stanley C. Gill, James A. Zwiebel, Malcolm J. Moore

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHepatocellular carcinomaInternal medicineChemotherapyDoxorubicinGastroenterologyNeutropeniaToxicityCirrhosisOncology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

14072 Background: Advanced HCC is refractory to most standard forms of chemotherapy, however responses to DOX are seen. The bcl-2 protein confers resistance to apoptosis in cancer cells and is important in tumor progression and resistance to chemotherapy. The bcl-2 antisense oligonucleotide, G3139 (G), has been shown to enhance the activity of DOX in tumor models by blocking bcl-2 synthesis. This argues for evaluating G + DOX in combination in HCC. By decreasing tumor bcl-2 protein levels, HCC may be sensitized to the apoptotic effects of DOX. Methods: We completed a phase II trial evaluating treatment with G at 7 mg/ kg for 7 days cont. i.v. infusion (d1–8) plus DOX at 45 mg/m2 i.v. bolus d5, every 28 d (as determined from our phase I HCC study). Eligible patients (pts) had path-confirmed, measurable, advanced HCC. Minimal eligibility included Childs-Pugh A cirrhosis, adequate hematological (hem) parameters and ECOG PS <2. Tumor biopsies for correlative studies were obtained at baseline and cycle 1 d 4 in consenting pts. Results: 19 patients were accrued, 1 was ineligible, 18 evaluable for toxicity, 17 evaluable for response; receiving a median (med) of 2 cycles (range 1,10). Risk for HCC was 39% HBV, 22% HCV, 17% alcohol, 22% other. Most common toxicities were hem and could be attributed to both G+DOX and to G alone. Overall grade 3–4 toxicities seen were: ANC- 67% (med nadir d 24–25), lymphopenia - 44%, thrombocytopenia - 6%, transaminitis - 33% and grade 1–2 G-fever - 67%. No responses were seen and the trial was stopped at stage 1. Six patients (35%) had stable disease, with one pt completing 10 cycles as per protocol (pt # 22). Med TTP is 1.8 months (1.7-NA) and 6-month PFS is 17.2% (5.3–56.4). 18 of 19 pts have died with med OS of only 5.4 months (2.7–11.6). Correlative studies on 3 available pts’ paired tumor biopsies showed absent baseline bcl-2 expression but moderate expression of both bcl-xl and BAX protein and with no change after exposure to G (includes pt #22). Conclusions: G + DOX is inactive in HCC at this dose and schedule. The overlap of hem toxicity may have resulted in suboptimal DOX dosing in HCC. Low baseline bcl-2 tumor expression relative to bcl-xl seen may suggest a relative insensitivity to the effects of bcl-2 inhibition in these HCC tumors. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicDNA Repair Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→