MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Report on the 21st SWS Annual Meeting

2000· article· en· W2232658214 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Allan S. Crowe

Bibliographic record

VenueWetland Science and Practice · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 21st Annual SWS Meeting was held in Quebec City, Canada during August 6-12, 2000. Unlike past SWS annual meetings, this one was held in collaboration with the annual meetings of three other cooperating societies: the International Peat Society 11th World Congress (IPS), the 9th Global Symposium of the International Mire Conservation Group (IMCG), and the 6th International Wetland Conference of the International Association of Ecology (INTECOL). This congress of four wetland societies chaired by Clayton Rubec and Bernard Belanger, known as Quebec 2000 The Millennium Wetland Event, became the largest wetland conference in history! A total of 2,068 participants attended from Canada, the United States and 68 other countries (see map). Hosting a conference of this size and coordinating the needs of the four societies could present problems. However, during the planning meetings, the societies had the courage and foresight to change their traditional ways of holding their annual conferences. The societies worked together to develop fully integrated social events, scientific programs, and administration. Still many of the events that are part of the SWS annual meetings, such as board meetings, chapter meetings, silent auction, awards banquet, etc., were preserved. In fact, the silent auction raised over $1,400 for the SWS Student Scholarship fund. From a scientific perspective, the meeting was an overwhelming success. There were 59 invited paper symposia, 72 contributed paper sessions, 1 poster session, 32 1-day field trips, 4 precongress and postcongress field trips, 6 training courses, and a very thick program book which contained the conference’s 1,416 abstracts (1,090 oral and 326 posters). Given the size and importance of the conference, The Millennium Wetland Event was able to attract considerable funds to support 138 delegates from developing countries. Finally, the conference organizers would like to thank all SWS members who attended, presented, and helped during The Millennium Wetland Event. The overwhelming participation of SWS members was a key reason for the ultimate success of this conference.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.754
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWetland Science and PracticeSame topicPeatlands and Wetlands EcologyFrench-language works237,207