Stratégies de résistance à la colonisation du corps des femmes en occident : le cas des musulmanes francophones en Ontario
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans une perspective postcoloniale et féministe qui articule colonialité et corps des musulmanes \nfrancophones et canadiennes, notre thèse explore dans quelle mesure les expériences du \nracisme et du sexisme autant de l’islam et que de l’Occident modèlent le rapport que ces \nfemmes entretiennent avec leur corps dans le contexte d’aujourd’hui exacerbé par les discours \nidéologiques et les violences entre l’islam et l’Occident qui réifient leur corps (femmes voilées, \nfemmes-burqas, femmes niqabiques). Ses résultats montrent une résistance des musulmanes à \nla colonisation de leur corps par une agentivité inédite qui se tente, d’une part, dans une \ndépossession des valeurs orientales qui autorisent le mariage colonial, la mutilation sexuelle et \nde multiples actes de violence fondés sur le genre, et, d’autre part, dans un essai de \nneutralisation des influences de la culture du pornographique, de l’hypersexualisation, et des \ndiscours médiatiques et idéologiques occidentales qui les infériorisent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.027 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".