MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2233480636 · doi:10.1115/imece2014-37744

A Complete Parametric Study of Pull-In Voltage by Nonlinear Differential Equation

2014· article· en· W2233480636 on OpenAlexaff
M. Amin Changizi, Ion Stiharu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCantileverNonlinear systemDeflection (physics)StiffnessDifferential equationVoltageParametric statisticsMicroelectromechanical systemsVibrationImpulse (physics)Beam (structure)Ordinary differential equationMechanicsPhysicsControl theory (sociology)Structural engineeringClassical mechanicsAcousticsMathematical analysisEngineeringMathematicsComputer scienceOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Micro-cantilever beams are interested structures in MEMS because of their fabrication is very easy and its versatility. The importance of micro-cantilevers beam in MEMS has driven various investigations like static and dynamic performances under different loading such as potential fields. In this research the non-linear differential equation which models dynamics of a micro-cantilever beams vibration subjected to electrostatic field has been studied. The model which has one degree of freedom is used to calculate the pull-in voltage. This model adopted based on different method of calculating stiffness of micro-cantilever beam. The nonlinear ordinary differential equation which used to model the dynamics of the cantilever subjected to electric field close to snap on is highly stiff. Investigation on solving of nonlinear stiff ordinary equation showed that only Lsode algorithm yield to correct solution to the problem. Lsode is equipped with a robust adaptive time step selection mechanism that enables solutions to very stiff problems, as the one under discussion. The best match in the resonant frequency for equivalent stiffness based on four different models was considered. The stiffness model suitable for the best match in deflection is proved to be different from the model that yields. Pull-in voltage under electric field was studied. Pull-in voltage has been investigated from the analytical and numerical perspective. A complete parametric study of structural damping effect on large deflection of micro-cantilever beam was studied was done numerically in this work. Different kind of impulse voltages were considered and effect of them on pulling voltage numerically was studied. A cumbersome mathematical method, Lie symmetry, was used to drive a closed from of time response to step voltage for undamped system and pull in voltage of such system was calculated. Finally, a closed form driven from the nonlinear ODE for calculating pulling voltage was presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207