Hydromechanical behaviour of unsaturated soil with different specimen preparations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of different specimen preparation methods (compaction, reconstitution) on the hydromechanical behaviour and microstructure of soil was studied through a series of soil-water retention tests, triaxial tests, and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) tests on an unsaturated clayey silt. Key findings from this experimental study include the following. (i) The air-entry value of the reconstituted specimen is higher than that of the compacted specimen with the same initial void ratio. (ii) The reconstituted specimen exhibits a unimodal pore-size distribution and the compacted specimen exhibits a bimodal pore-size distribution, according to results of the MIP tests. (iii) The soil-water characteristic curves and residual gravimetric water content of compacted and reconstituted specimens are almost the same in the high suction range. (iv) The void ratio of a reconstituted specimen decreases sharply with increasing suction value under an isotropic net stress (such as 20 kPa), while the void ratio of a compacted specimen shows a small change for the same suction change process. (v) Under the same net confining pressure, the shear strength of both compacted and reconstituted specimens increases with the suction increase. The shear strength of the reconstituted specimen is higher than that of the compacted specimen with the same density under the same suction and net confining pressure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".