MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2234364853 · doi:10.33137/rr.v36i3.8645

Carpe Corpus. Time and Gender in Early Modern France

2000· article· en· W2234364853 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Cathy Yandell, Jane Couchman

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

siècle suivant le Traité historique sur les Amazones de Pierre Petit [1718], l'Histoire des Amazones anciennes et modernes de l'abbé Guyon [1740], etc.).Il est dommage que l'Amazone chrétienne, pseudonyme de la très célèbre Madame de Balesmont, ne reçoive pas un traitement plus complet.Car comme le souligne Steinberg elle-même, il s'agit là d'un moment capital dans l'évolution du mythe.Avec ce personnage, la figure antique de l'Amazone recouvre sa signification première (symbole de la force, de la vaillance féminine et de la virginité), elle revêt aussi un sens chrétien (l'Amazone incarne alors les vertus chrétiennes de piété, de générosité, de charité).Le recueil se termine avec la savante étude d'Elizabeth Hyde sur le symbolisme floral et le traité sur les fleurs (1676) du sieur de l'Ecluse, dans lequel celle-ci décèle des résistances, des inquiétudes face au pouvoir des femmes, voire un désir de retour à l'ordre qui allait marquer l'arrivée au pouvoir de Louis XIV.Malgré le problème de cohérence signalé plus haut (commun à tous les actes de colloque), ce recueil, écrit autant pour stimuler que pour élucider, atteint son but en forçant à s'interroger sur la notion même de pouvoir, sur la question du rapport entre les sexes, et en aidant à mieux comprendre l'implication des femmes dans la vie politique, culturelle et sociale de l'époque moderne.On sait gré aux éditrices de lui avoir donné le jour.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and ReformationSame topicRenaissance Literature and CultureFrench-language works237,207