MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2234398872

Diffusion MRI Analysis Techniques Inspired by the Preterm Infant Brain

2015· dissertation· en· W2234398872 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Brian G. Booth

Bibliographic record

VenueSummit (Simon Fraser University) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSimon Fraser University
KeywordsDiffusion MRINeuroscienceMedicineDiffusionPsychologyMagnetic resonance imagingPhysicsRadiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diffusion MRI (dMRI) is a powerful imaging modality that allows us to non-invasively examine the organization and integrity of fibrous tissue, particularly the brain's white matter.The result of a dMRI scan is a 3D image where each voxel contains a model that describes the local diffusion pattern of water molecules.The complicated nature and high dimensionality of these voxel-wise models make dMRI analysis especially challenging.The challenges increase when we look at dMRI scans from infants born prematurely.The smaller brain size for these infants, and the still-emerging brain structures these infants possess, increase the challenges involved in processing, analyzing, and interpreting dMRI scans.This thesis introduces four computational contributions in the area of dMRI analysis that attempt to address challenges exacerbated when imaging the preterm infant brain.Specifically, these four contributions are: (a) the first information content estimators for unaltered dMRI data, including a mutual information estimator for image registration; (b) a novel dMRI segmentation algorithm based on a cross-sectional piecewise constant image model;(c) the first global, closed-form probabilistic tractography algorithm, one where tracts compete for space in the brain; and (d) STEAM: the first patient-specific statistical abnormality mapping technique.In these four contributions, we model the dMRI data more accurately in order to improve the accuracy of dMRI analysis techniques, particularly in the presence of the small brain sizes and still-emerging brain structures seen in preterm infant dMRI.We further make the source code for these contributions publicly available to aid in the reproducibility of our research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSummit (Simon Fraser University)Same topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207