MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2234521185 · doi:10.1101/pdb.top084111

Construction of Multifragment Plasmids by Homologous Recombination in Yeast

2015· article· en· W2234521185 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCold Spring Harbor Protocols · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicFungal and yeast genetics research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHoward Hughes Medical Institute
KeywordsHomologous recombinationPlasmidCloning (programming)Saccharomyces cerevisiaeGeneticsYeastGenomeIn vitro recombinationFLP-FRT recombinationBiologyComputational biologyDNAHomologous chromosomeInsert (composites)GeneMolecular cloningRecombinationGenetic recombinationComputer sciencePeptide sequence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past decade, the focus of cloning has shifted from constructing plasmids that express a single gene of interest to creating multigenic constructs that contain entire pathways or even whole genomes. Traditional cloning methods that rely on restriction digestion and ligation are limited by the number and size of fragments that can efficiently be combined. Here, we focus on the use of homologous-recombination-based DNA manipulation in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae for the construction of plasmids from multiple DNA fragments. Owing to its simplicity and high efficiency, cloning by homologous recombination in yeast is very accessible and can be applied to high-throughput construction procedures. Its applications extend beyond yeast-centered purposes and include the cloning of large mammalian DNA sequences and entire bacterial genomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.371

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it