MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2236348715

Contribution méthodologique à l’évaluation médicoéconomique des programmes de vaccination

2015· dissertation· fr· W2236348715 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Samuel Aballéa

Bibliographic record

Venuetheses.fr (ABES) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMedicineGynecologyPolitical scienceArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'evaluation medico-economique (EME) joue un role de plus en plus important dans le developpement des recommandations cliniques et les decisions de prix et remboursement des produits de sante, notamment des vaccins. L'EME des vaccins fait l'objet de procedures et de recommandations methodologiques specifiques, distinctes des medicaments, dans de nombreux pays. Cette these illustre et repertorie les differentes questions methodologiques concernant l'EME des programmes de vaccination sur la base de six etudes : estimation de la morbidite, mortalite et couts lies aux infections a cytomegalovirus chez les receveurs de greffe d'organe solide ; description de l'etat de sante subjectif et qualite de vie liee a la sante chez les femmes atteintes de candidose vulvovaginale recurrente (CVVR) ; revue critique des EME de la vaccination de rappel contre la coqueluche ; revue critique des EME de la vaccination contre le rotavirus ; analyse cout-efficacite de la vaccination antigrippale chez les personnes de 50 a 64 ans ; analyse cout-efficacite d'un vaccin antigrippal quadrivalent en Ontario. L'EME des programmes de vaccination necessite de predire l'effet d'un vaccin dans la vie reelle a partir d'essais cliniques, ce qui est particulierement difficile pour plusieurs raisons : l'epidemiologie d'une infection peut varier dans le temps et l'espace, la reduction du risque d'infection apres vaccination est differente de celle du risque de maladie, et la vaccination peut conduire a une augmentation ou diminution du risque chez les personnes non-vaccinees. De plus, la mesure et la valorisation des effets sur la qualite de vie soulevent des questions methodologiques et requierent des choix normatifs lies aux faits que de nombreux vaccins ciblent les enfants, et que la reduction du risque peut ameliorer la qualite de vie en dehors des periodes de maladie. Nous etablissons finalement des recommandations pour les futures EME de programmes de vaccination, concernant la definition des strategies a comparer, le choix de structure de modele, l'estimation des parametres cliniques et epidemiologiques, et la mesure et la valorisation de la qualite de vie et des couts

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.721
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.416
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuetheses.fr (ABES)Same topicViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiologyFrench-language works237,207