MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2236390092 · doi:10.1142/s2345737615500098

Constraining Frequency Distributions with the Probable Maximum Precipitation for the Stochastic Generation of Realistic Extreme Events

2015· article· en· W2236390092 on OpenAlex
Jie Chen, François Brissette, Przemysław Zieliński

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Extreme Events · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Drought Analysis
Canadian institutionsOntario Power GenerationÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersRecruitment Program of Global ExpertsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsWeibull distributionPrecipitationRange (aeronautics)Probability distributionParametric statisticsExtreme value theoryDistribution (mathematics)Gamma distributionGoodness of fitCurve fittingJoint probability distributionParametric modelMathematicsStatisticsMeteorologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stochastic weather generators are widely used to produce large ensembles of climate time series for assessing risk-based environmental impacts. However, they often perform poorly at generating extreme values since the fitting of traditionally used distribution functions is limited by short historical records. In such cases, extreme values are generated by extrapolating the fitted distributions far outside of observations, and can result in values outside of the physically possible range. This work uses a curve-fitting approach constrained on the probable maximum precipitation (PMP) to allow for the generation of realistic precipitation over the entire range of daily precipitation amounts. The method differs from the traditional parametric approach which assumes that the daily precipitation follows a specific probability distribution. Instead, the curve-fitting approach uses a second-degree polynomial to fit the Weibull experimental frequency distribution of observed daily precipitation. In this process, the PMP is specifically represented with its associated probability of occurrence, thus ensuring the realistic representation of extreme precipitation events. The proposed algorithm is compared to three distribution functions (of varied complexity) for simulating daily precipitation amounts at 35 stations dispersed across central and southern Quebec, Canada. The curve-fitting approach is presented in two versions: with and without constraint on the PMP. The results show that compound distribution functions perform better than their single distribution counterparts at representing the overall distribution of daily precipitation amounts, especially when simulating the upper tail. The unconstrained curve-fitting approach consistently performs better than all of the distribution functions with respect to preserving the statistical characteristics (e.g., mean, standard deviation and overall distribution) of daily precipitation amounts. Constraining the second-degree polynomial to the PMP is an effective way to generate the entire range of daily precipitation amounts with no risk of generating physically impossible values for events with extremely small probability. However, its overall performance is slightly less than that of its unconstrained counterpart.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.628
Threshold uncertainty score0.220

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it