MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2237200327

LLEGA A MÉXICO LOS ENDEBLES, DE MICHEL-MARC BOUCHARD; ACTORES UNIVERSITARIOS EN EL ELENCO

2000· article· es· W2237200327 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Boris Schoemann, Martha Herrera Bernal

Bibliographic record

VenueGaceta UNAM (2000-2009) · 2000
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicComparative Literary Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

EL 11 DE FEBRERO SE ESTRENO EN EL TEATRO LA CAPILLA LA PUESTA EN ESCENA ENDEBLES, BAJO LA DIRECCION DE BORIS SCHOEMANN. LA PRODUCCION EST  A CARGO DEL CENTRO UNIVERSITARIO DE TEATRO (CUT) DE LA UNAM Y DE LA DELEGACION GENERAL DE QUEBEC, QUIENES PRESENTAN POR PRIMERA VEZ EN MEXICO LA OBRA DEL DRAMATURGO MICHEL-MARC BOUCHARD, TRADUCIDA POR BORIS SCHOEMANN. CON 11 ACTORES EN ESCENA, TODOS ELLOS HOMBRES AUNQUE ALGUNOS INTERPRETAN PERSONAJES FEMENINOS, ESTA SENSIBLE Y CONMOVEDORA PROPUESTA TEATRAL DEFINIDA COMO UNA TRAMA SOBRE EL AMOR ENTRE DOS JOVENES, CUYO TITULO ORIGINAL ES LES FELUETTES, ABORDA EL PROBLEMA DE LA INTOLERANCIA, LA MANIPULACION DE LAS MENTES POR EL PESO DE PRINCIPIOS MORALES Y RELIGIOSOS, LA NEGACION DE LA DIFERENCIA Y DE LA SENSIBILIDAD EN LA SOCIEDAD QUEBEQUENSE DE PRINCIPIOS DEL SIGLO XX, TEMAS QUE ENCUENTRAN ECO Y SIMILITUDES EVIDENTES EN EL MEXICO MODERNO. ESCRITA EN 1987, LA OBRA TUVO UN EXITO INMEDIATO EN CANAD  Y EN LOS PAISES DONDE SE HA ESCENIFICADO DESDE ENTONCES. EN 1996, EL DIRECTOR DE COMEDIA JOHN GREYSON LA LLEVO A LA PANTALLA GRANDE CON UN GUION DEL MISMO BOUCHARD, BAJO EL TITULO DE LILIES, PELICULA QUE GANO ESE MISMO ANO CUATRO PREMIOS JENNIE. ENDEBLES SE PRESENTA DE VIERNES A DOMINGO EN EL TEATRO LA CAPILLA (MADRID 13, COYOAC N) HASTA EL 9 DE ABRIL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score0.388

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGaceta UNAM (2000-2009)Same topicComparative Literary Analysis and CriticismFrench-language works237,207