MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2237349858

Bifurcation of a Rural-Urban Regional Partnership: A Study of Hidden Dynamics

2016· article· en· W2237349858 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Lorraine A. Nicol, Christopher J. Nicol

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of rural and community development · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRural development and sustainability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral partnershipPower (physics)Political scienceSociologyHumanitiesLawPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Region-based solutions present a promising avenue to addressing contemporary challenges facing municipalities. But regional formations require the messy reworking of networks of power among multiple stakeholders, often leading to power struggles. Challenges can be compounded when a rural-urban dimension is added to such an undertaking. This study examined the hidden power dynamics of a case involving 18 rural and urban municipalities in the Calgary region of Alberta called the Calgary Regional Partnership (CRP). In 2005 these municipalities voluntarily embarked on a major city-region initiative involving land-use planning and water sharing. However, by 2009 four rural municipalities had left the CRP, bifurcating the partnership along rural and urban lines. The dynamics of this case were traced through time and viewed through the lens of Foucault’s concepts of discourse and mechanisms of exclusion as well as Hajer’s concepts of metaphors, story-lines and discourse coalitions. The study demonstrates how mechanisms of exclusion led to the creation of dominant discourses, the formation of coalitions around counter-discourses, and the eventual disintegration of the rural-urban dimension of the partnership. Keywords: water, regionalism, Foucault, Hajer, discourse, power --------------------------------------------------- Resume Les solutions par region sont un moyen prometteur pour faire face aux defis contemporains des municipalites. Cependant, les formations regionales requierent le remaniement confus des reseaux de pouvoirs parmi de multiples parties prenantes, menant souvent a des luttes de pouvoir. Des defis peuvent etre amplifies lorsqu'une dimension rurale-urbaine est ajoutee a une telle entreprise. Cette etude examine les dynamiques de pouvoir cachees d'un cas impliquant 18 municipalites rurales et urbaines dans la region de Calgary, en Alberta, appelee Calgary Region Partnership (CRP) ou Region du Partenariat de Calgary. En 2005, ces municipalites volontaires se sont embarquees dans une initiative majeure municipalo-regionale impliquant la planification territoriale et le partage des eaux. Cependant, avant 2009, quatre municipalites rurales avaient deja quitte le CRP, separant les partenariats entre les lignes rurales et urbaines. Les dynamiques de ce cas ont ete tracees a travers le temps et considerees sous l'angle des concepts du discours et des mecanismes d'exclusion de Foucault ainsi que les concepts de metaphores, de scenarios et de coalitions discursives de Hajer. L'etude montre dans quelle mesure les mecanismes menent a la creation de discours dominants, a la formation de coalition autour de contre-courants, et a l'eventuelle desintegration d'une dimension rurale-urbaine d'un partenariat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.478
Threshold uncertainty score0.185

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of rural and community developmentSame topicRural development and sustainabilityFrench-language works237,207