MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2238096199 · doi:10.1002/ejoc.201501592

Enantioselective Total Synthesis of the Proposed Structure of the Endophytic Fungal Metabolite Phomolide G: Structural Revision and Unambiguous Stereochemical Assignment

2016· article· en· W2238096199 on OpenAlexaff
James McNulty, David McLeod, Hilary A. Jenkins

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Organic Chemistry · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryDiastereomerTotal synthesisEnantioselective synthesisAldol reactionStereochemistryNatural productNitrileKetoneAlkylationAldehydeAbsolute configurationSubstrate (aquarium)Organic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A total synthesis of the proposed structure of the natural macrolactone phomolide G ( 1 ) by a bidirectional strategy from L ‐tartaric acid is reported. The ω‐terminus of the molecule was elaborated by nitrile extension, C3‐alkylation and a substrate‐controlled 1,3‐ketone reduction. The α‐terminus was extended by a C 2 aldehyde‐to‐alkenal homologation followed by an auxiliary controlled aldol reaction. Macrolactonization and deprotection yielded compound 1 (confirmed by X‐ray analysis). This putative structure of phomolide G displayed discordant NMR spectroscopic data in comparison with those of the natural product. Detailed inspection of all NMR spectroscopic data available indicated phomolide G to be likely a diastereomer of 1 . The synthetic strategy developed allows control of the absolute stereochemistry at all four chiral secondary alcohol groups. Further manipulation allowed for the preparation of diastereomer 33 , the 1 H and 13 C NMR spectroscopic data of which are in full accord with that reported for the natural product.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Organic ChemistrySame topicSynthetic Organic Chemistry MethodsFrench-language works237,207