An Alkylidene Carbene C–H Activation Approach toward the Enantioselective Syntheses of Spirolactams: Application to the Synthesis of (−)-Adalinine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A method based on in situ alkylidene carbene generation-C-H insertion reaction of 5-(3-oxobutyl)pyrrolidin-2-ones and 6-(3-oxobutyl)piperidin-2-ones is developed for the enantioselective synthesis of 1-azaspiro[4,4]non-6-ene-2-ones and 6-azaspiro[4,5]dec-1-ene-7-ones. The required 5-(3-oxobutyl)pyrrolidin-2-ones and 6-(3-oxobutyl)piperidin-2-ones are prepared from the Wacker oxidation of internal alkenes typified by 5-(but-2-enyl)pyrrolidin-2-ones and 6-(but-2-enyl)piperidin-2-ones, respectively. Excellent regioselectivity (≥92:8) is realized for the Wacker oxidation, and high yields (78-89%) of the desired lactam ketones are obtained. The results from further investigations into the Wacker oxidation suggested that the high regioselectivity of the oxidation in these lactam alkenes might be due to the participation of the lactam nitrogen via intramolecular coordination to Pd(II) during the reaction. Studies on alkylidene carbene generation-C-H insertion reaction of the lactam ketones revealed that the reaction efficiency is sensitive to the reaction temperature and the amount of lithio(trimethylsilyl)diazomethane employed, which led to the development of optimal reaction conditions for effecting alkylidene carbene generation-C-H insertion. Using the optimal reaction conditions, good to high yields (53-76%) of both γ- and δ-lactam spirocycles were obtained. The synthetic utility of the spirolactams was demonstrated by the synthesis of (-)-adalinine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".