First principles study on structural and electronic properties and defect formation enthalpies of cubic Hf<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub> under high pressure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using the self-consistent density functional method, we investigate the structural and electronic properties of cubic Hf3N4 with Th3P4 structure at ambient and high pressures. The lattice parameters, cell volume, bulk modulus, and pressure derivative at ambient pressure are obtained, which are in excellent agreement with the available measurements. The change of bond lengths for two different types of Hf–N bond with pressure suggests that the tetrahedral Hf–N bond is slightly less compressible than the octahedral ones, which agree well with the Zr3N4 and Zn3N2 results. The band gap pressure coefficient for c-Hf3N4 are fitted, which are 8.5 × 10−2 eV/GPa and –7.0 × 10−5 eV/(GPa)2, respectively. Based on the density of states analysis, band structure suggests that the investigated material can be used as a semiconductor optical material. Mulliken population analysis shows that the charge density of the Hf atom is less sensitive to pressure variation than that of the N atom. At last, the defect formation enthalpies of the cubic Hf3N4 are calculated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".